Affiliation:
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India
2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery Kovai Medical Center Hospital Coimbatore Tamil Nadu India
3. Department of Endocrinology All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundTo assess the promise of surgical magnification and of intraoperative indocyanine green (ICG) assisted near‐infrared fluorescence (NIRF) in improving parathyroid identification and viability assessment during thyroidectomy.MethodsProspective comparative study. Parathyroid gland identification sequentially assessed by naked eye, surgical microscopy, and by NIRF imaging following ICG administration (5 mgIV). Parathyroid perfusion/vitality reassessed end‐surgery by ICG‐NIRF.ResultsAn expected total of 104 parathyroid glands were assessed in 35 patients (17 total‐thyroidectomy, 18 hemi‐thyroidectomy). 54/104 (51.9%) were identified by naked eye, and sequentially greater numbers identified by microscope magnification (n = 61; 58.7%; p = 0.33), and by ICG‐NIRF (n = 72; 69.2%; p = 0.01). ICG‐NIRF detected additional parathyroid glands in 16/35 patients (45.7%). Confident identification of at least one parathyroid remained unachieved in 5/35 by naked eye, in 4/35 by microscopic magnification, and in no patient by ICG‐NIRF. ICG‐NIRF indicated end‐of‐surgery devascularization in 12/72 glands and informed decisions regarding gland implantation.ConclusionSignificantly greater parathyroid glands are identified and preserved with surgical magnification and with ICG‐NIRF. Both techniques merit routine adoption for thyroidectomy.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献