Patient‐reported outcomes in immunotherapy for head and neck cancer

Author:

Kirtane Kedar1ORCID,Hoogland Aasha I.2,Li Xiaoyin2,Rodriguez Yvelise2,Scheel Kelsey2,Small Brent J.3,Oswald Laura B.2,Muzaffar Jameel1,Kish Julie A.4,Bonomi Marcelo5,Bhateja Priyanka5,Saba Nabil F.6ORCID,Steuer Conor E.6,Chung Christine H.1,Jim Heather S. L.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Head and Neck‐Endocrine Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA

2. Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA

3. School of Aging Studies University of South Florida Tampa Florida USA

4. Department of Personalized Medicine Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa Florida USA

5. Department of Internal Medicine and The James Comprehensive Cancer Center The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA

6. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundData about patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are sparse. Our exploratory study evaluated PROs in patients with HNSCC starting treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy with cetuximab.MethodsPatients were recruited prior to receipt of their first checkpoint inhibitor therapy infusion. Participants completed measures of checkpoint inhibitor toxicities and quality of life (QOL) at on‐treatment clinic visits.ResultsAmong patients treated with checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (n = 48) or combination therapy (n = 38) toxicity increased over time (p < 0.05), while overall QOL improved from baseline to 12 weeks, with stable or declining QOL thereafter (p < 0.05). There were no group differences in change in toxicity index or QOL. Toxicity index scores were significantly higher in the combination group at 18–20 weeks and 6 months post‐initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (p < 0.05). There were no significant group differences at baseline, the 6–8 week (p = 0.13) or 3‐month (p = 0.09) evaluations. The combination group reported better emotional well‐being at baseline than the monotherapy group (p = 0.04), There were no other group differences QOL at baseline or later timepoints.ConclusionsDespite increasing patient‐reported toxicity, checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy were associated with similar transient improvements, then worsening, of QOL in patients with HNSCC.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3