When views about alternative medicine, nature and god come in the way of people's vaccination intentions

Author:

Van Oost Pascaline12ORCID,Schmitz Mathias1ORCID,Klein Olivier2ORCID,Brisbois Marie2ORCID,Luminet Olivier13ORCID,Morbée Sofie4ORCID,Raemdonck Eveline4ORCID,Van den Bergh Omer5ORCID,Vansteenkiste Maarten4ORCID,Waterschoot Joachim4ORCID,Yzerbyt Vincent1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Research in the Psychological Sciences Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain‐la‐Neuve Louvain‐la‐Neuve Belgium

2. Faculty of Psychological Sciences and Education Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels Bruxelles Belgium

3. Fund for Scientific Research (FRS‐FNRS) Brussels Belgium

4. Department of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology Universiteit Gent, Ghent Gent Belgium

5. Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven Belgium

Abstract

AbstractIn spite of the safety and efficiency of the COVID‐19 vaccines and the many promotion efforts of political and expert authorities, a fair portion of the population remained hesitant if not opposed to vaccination. Public debate and the available literature point to the possible role of people's attitudes towards medical institutions as well as their preference for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) on their motivations and intentions to be vaccinated. Other potential ideological factors are beliefs about environmental laissez‐faire and divine providence insofar as they encourage people to let the pandemic unfold without human interference. In three cross‐sectional samples (total N = 8214), collected at successive moments during the Belgian vaccination campaign, the present research examines the distal role of these psychological and ideological factors on vaccination intentions via motivational processes. Study 1 gauges the relation between trust in medical institutions and preference for CAM on intentions to get vaccinated via motivations. Study 2 examined the role of beliefs in the desirability of letting nature take its course (‘environmental laissez‐faire beliefs’) on vaccination intention via motivations. Study 3 tests whether people's adherence to environmental laissez‐faire and beliefs about divine providence are linked to their motivations for vaccination via trust in the medical institutions and CAM. Results show that adherence to CAM has a deleterious effect on vaccination intentions, whereas trust in medical institutions has a positive effect. Both ideological factors pertaining to external control are only moderately related, with environmental laissez‐faire beliefs having stronger effects on CAM, medical trust and vaccination motivations. We discuss the importance of this set of results in light of the growing interest in CAM and the increasing presence of messages appealing to the environment.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3