Facilitators and barriers to “Positive Outcomes” from cognitive‐behavioral therapy, according to young people: A thematic synthesis

Author:

Redburn James1ORCID,Hayes Ben1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Educational and Health Psychology University College London London UK

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis qualitative review sought to explore how young people (YP) conceptualize positive outcomes from cognitive‐behavioral therapy (CBT) and what YP perceive to be the facilitators and barriers to positive outcomes.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in June 2021 using six online databases. Studies were included if qualitative data were collected from participants who were aged up to 25, had internalizing mental health difficulties, and had received in‐person CBT from trained practitioners.ResultsNineteen studies were included. The Gough Weight of Evidence framework was used to assess methodological and topical quality and relevance. A thematic synthesis identified 34 conceptualizations of positive outcomes, 57 facilitators, and 49 barriers. Descriptive and analytical themes were identified. In line with the review's pragmatic perspective, the latter were worded as practice recommendations: acknowledge YP's perspectives on outcomes, teach tangible CBT techniques, balance autonomy and support, frame CBT as “upskilling,” explore nuanced barriers to engagement, and consider the power of group dynamics.ConclusionsThis review established the range of YP's views about positive outcomes from CBT, as well as facilitators and barriers to achieving these. Findings should prompt CBT practitioners to reflect and consider how their practice might be shaped through reports from YP as experts by experience.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference92 articles.

1. The influence of power shifts in data collection and analysis stages: A focus on qualitative research interview;Anyan F.;Qualitative Report,2013

2. Exploring perceived barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in adolescents: a systematic literature review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3