Value of pelvic examination in women with pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review

Author:

Pizzoferrato Anne‐Cécile12ORCID,Sallée Camille3,Thubert Thibault4,Fauconnier Arnaud56,Deffieux Xavier67

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology CHU de Poitiers Poitiers France

2. Université de Poitiers, CIC‐Inserm, DECLAN Poitiers France

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Limoges University Hospital Limoges France

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nantes University Hospital Nantes France

5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Intercommunal Hospital Center of Poissy Saint‐Germain‐en‐Laye Poissy France

6. Paris‐Saclay University Montigny‐le‐Bretonneux France

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Antoine Béclère Hospital Clamart France

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundRecent recommendations from the French High Authority of Health on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) management underline the value of a pelvic examination.ObjectivesThe aim of this paper was to analyze the literature and identify the best evidence available regarding pelvic examination for women presenting prolapse‐associated symptoms in terms of diagnosis and predictability of treatment success.Search StrategyThe databases were queried similarly using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and non‐MeSH terms broadly related to pelvic examination and POP management.Selection CriteriaWe included studies assessing the diagnostic contribution of pelvic examination (correlation with symptoms) and its value for assessing the risk of pessary failure or recurrence after reconstructive surgery.Data Collection and AnalysisWe assessed peer‐reviewed articles on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane database up to May 2023. The methodological quality of all the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS‐E or RoB2 tools.Main ResultsIn all, 67 studies were retained for the review. Prolapse‐associated symptoms are poorly correlated with POP diagnosis. The symptom that is best correlated with the POP stage is the presence of a vaginal bulge (moderate to good correlation). The factors most strongly associated with the risk of recurrence after surgery or pessary failure are clinical: essentially a higher POP stage before surgery, levator ani muscle avulsion, and vaginal and genital measurements.ConclusionsIn women complaining of prolapse‐associated symptoms, a pelvic examination (vaginal speculum and digital vaginal examination) can confirm the presence of POP and identify risk factors for treatment failure or recurrence after surgical management or pessary placement. A higher stage of POP and levator ani muscle avulsion—discernible on pelvic examination—are major risk factors for POP recurrence or treatment failure. These features must be taken into account in the treatment choice and discussed with the patient.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3