Affiliation:
1. Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet IIS Aragón Zaragoza Spain
2. Cirugía General y del Aparato Digestivo Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa II Aragón Zaragoza Spain
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundOur objective was to compare the coronal mechanical axis after total knee replacement (TKR) obtained in three groups of patients subjected to conventional, navigated, and robotic surgery.MethodsRetrospective analysis.Results124 knees were included (36 conventional, 41 navigated, 47 robotic). No statistically significant differences were found between the postOp tibiofemoral angle of the conventional, navigated and robotic groups (p = 0.396). A repeated‐measure analysis of preOp‐to‐postOp also found no significant differences (p = 0.387). There were no differences in the proportion of outliers (3‐degree) found (p = 0.211). Nevertheless, a higher proportion of patients in the robotic group improved their mechanical alignment, as compared with conventional surgery (p = 0.023), although no differences were found when comparing with navigation (p = 0.121).ConclusionsNo statistically significant differences were found with respect to the postOp alignment achieved. However, statistically significant differences were detected between robotic and conventional surgery when considering the percentage of patients with improved limb alignment.
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Biophysics,Surgery
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献