Medically ready for discharge: A multisite “point‐in‐time” assessment of hospitalized patients

Author:

Bann Maralyssa12ORCID,Meo Nicholas12,Lopez J. P.3,Ou Amy4ORCID,Rosenthal Molly125ORCID,Khawaja Hussain67ORCID,Goodman Leigh A.89ORCID,Barone Melanie10,Coleman Bernice10,High Heidi J.10,Overbeek Lori11,Shelbourn Pam11,VerMaas Lisa11,Baughman Amy1213ORCID,Sekaran Adith12,Cyrus Rachel14,O'Dorisio Nathan15,Beatty Lane16,Loica‐Mersa Silvia17ORCID,Kubey Alan1819ORCID,Jaffe Rebecca19,Vokoun Chad20,Koom‐Dadzie Kwame21ORCID,Graves Kencee22ORCID,Tuck Matthew23ORCID,Helgerson Paul24ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle Washington USA

2. Harborview Medical Center Seattle Washington USA

3. University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

4. University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USA

5. University of Washington Medical Center Seattle Washington USA

6. Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School Providence Rhode Island USA

7. Rhode Island Hospital Providence Rhode Island USA

8. University of Arizona College of Medicine—Phoenix Phoenix Arizona USA

9. Banner‐University Medical Center—Phoenix Phoenix Arizona USA

10. Cedars‐Sinai Medical Center Los Angeles California USA

11. Bryan Medical Center Lincoln Nebraska USA

12. Massachussetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

13. Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

14. Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University Chicago Illinois USA

15. Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA

16. Springfield Hospital Springfield Vermont USA

17. Stanford School of Medicine Pleasanton California USA

18. Mayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA

19. Thomas Jefferson University Sidney Kimmel Medical College Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

20. University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha Nebraska USA

21. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

22. University of Utah Health Salt Lake City Utah USA

23. Washington DC VA Medical Center Washington District of Columbia USA

24. University of Virginia Health System Charlottesville Virginia USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundTime spent awaiting discharge after the acute need for hospitalization has resolved is an important potential contributor to hospital length of stay (LOS).ObjectiveTo measure the prevalence, impact, and context of patients who remain hospitalized for prolonged periods after completion of acute care needs.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe conducted a cross‐sectional “point‐in‐time” survey at each of 15 academic US hospitals using a structured data collection tool with on‐service acute care medicine attending physicians in fall 2022.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcomes were number and percentage of patients considered “medically ready for discharge” with emphasis on those who had experienced a “major barrier to discharge” (medically ready for discharge for ≥1 week). Estimated LOS attributable to major discharge barriers, contributory discharge needs, and associated hospital characteristics were measured.ResultsOf 1928 patients sampled, 35.0% (n = 674) were medically ready for discharge including 9.8% (n = 189) with major discharge barriers. Many patients with major discharge barriers (44.4%; 84/189) had spent a month or longer medically ready for discharge and commonly (84.1%; 159/189) required some form of skilled therapy or daily living support services for discharge. Higher proportions of patients experiencing major discharge barriers were found in public versus private, nonprofit hospitals (12.0% vs. 7.2%; p = .001) and county versus noncounty hospitals (14.5% vs. 8.8%; p = .002).ConclusionsPatients experience major discharge barriers in many US hospitals and spend prolonged time awaiting discharge, often for support needs that may be outside of clinician control.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Assessment and Diagnosis,Care Planning,Health Policy,Fundamentals and skills,General Medicine,Leadership and Management

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3