Medicine on the Fringe: Stem Cell-Based Interventions in Advance of Evidence

Author:

Regenberg Alan C.1,Hutchinson Lauren A.2,Schanker Benjamin3,Mathews Debra J. H.1

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

2. The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, United Kingdom

3. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Abstract

Abstract Stem cell-based interventions (SCBIs) offer great promise; however, there is currently little internationally accepted, scientific evidence supporting the clinical use of SCBIs. The consensus within the scientific community is that a number of hurdles still need to be cleared. Despite this, SCBIs are currently being offered to patients. This article provides a content analysis of materials obtained from SCBI providers. We find content that strains credulity and almost no evidence of SCBIs being delivered in the context of clinical trials. We conclude that until scientific evidence is available, as a general rule, providers should only offer SCBIs in the context of controlled clinical trials. Clients should be aware that the risks and benefits of SCBIs are unknown, that their participation is unlikely to advance scientific knowledge, and they are likely to become ineligible to participate in future clinical trials of SCBIs. We recommend steps to promote patient education and enhance global oversight. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cell Biology,Developmental Biology,Molecular Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Trade in health services in the ASEAN region;Arunanondchai;Health Promotint,2006

2. Medical tourism: globalization of the healthcare marketplace;Horowitz;Medgenmed,2007

3. Biomedicine: selling the stem cell dream;Enserink;Science,2006

4. Neuroprotective effect of transplanted human embryonic stem cell-derived neural precursors in an animal model of multiple sclerosis;Aharonowiz;Plos One,2008

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3