Affiliation:
1. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 1722 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 USA
2. Forestry Program Southern Illinois University Carbondale Illinois 62901 USA
3. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources and Program in Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 USA
Abstract
AbstractWild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) gobbling is a key component of hunter satisfaction, also providing insight into the underlying reproductive ecology of wild turkeys that can inform regulatory decisions. However, monitoring gobbling chronology over large geographic areas can be logistically challenging and identifying efficient monitoring schemes can help wildlife agencies better manage the species. We evaluated the efficacy and utility of autonomous recording units (ARUs) to detect wild turkey gobbles and deployed 51 ARUs to monitor gobbling chronology in North Carolina, USA. We conducted controlled field‐tests at 20 locations to compare how detection of gobbles differed by ARU software, manual review of ARUs, and in‐field human observers. Autonomous detections had the lowest probability, with detection probabilities approaching 0 at 300 m from the ARU. Autonomous detections of gobbles were affected by leaf‐on conditions and topographical interference while vegetation type surrounding ARUs had minimal and inconsistent effects on detection. We deployed ARUs on properties with little or no turkey hunting across North Carolina from March–May during 2016 through 2019 to explore annual and regional variation in gobbling chronology. We used ARUs to monitor gobbling chronology and recorded 53,943 hours of audio files from which we confirmed 113,737 gobbles out of a total of 602,053 possible sound events identified. We identified multimodal gobbling chronology across 3 primary physiographic regions in North Carolina. We also found comparable timing of gobbling chronology across the 3 regions, with 57–61% of gobbling occurring during the weeks in which hunting seasons occur. We recommend that researchers validate ARU performance to calibrate monitoring of gobbling chronology. Additionally, our gobbling chronology data suggest that a statewide framework, rather than a regionally split framework, is appropriate for wild turkey hunting in North Carolina.
Reference38 articles.
1. Mode testing, critical bandwidth and excess mass
2. Bevill W. V. Jr.1973.Some factors influencing gobbling activity among wild turkeys.Proceedings of the Twenty‐Seventh Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners27:62‒73.
3. Bevill W. V. Jr.1975.Setting spring gobbler hunting seasons by timing peak gobbling.National Wild Turkey Symposium3:198‒2045.
4. Use of autonomous recording units increased detection of a secretive marsh bird
5. Gobbling activity of eastern wild turkeys relative to male movements and female nesting phenology in South Carolina
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献