Efficacy of autonomous recording units to evaluate wild turkey gobbling chronology in North Carolina, USA

Author:

Kreh Christopher D.1ORCID,Pease Brent S.2,Pacifici Krishna3

Affiliation:

1. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission 1722 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC 27699 USA

2. Forestry Program Southern Illinois University Carbondale Illinois 62901 USA

3. Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources and Program in Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology North Carolina State University Raleigh North Carolina 27695 USA

Abstract

AbstractWild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) gobbling is a key component of hunter satisfaction, also providing insight into the underlying reproductive ecology of wild turkeys that can inform regulatory decisions. However, monitoring gobbling chronology over large geographic areas can be logistically challenging and identifying efficient monitoring schemes can help wildlife agencies better manage the species. We evaluated the efficacy and utility of autonomous recording units (ARUs) to detect wild turkey gobbles and deployed 51 ARUs to monitor gobbling chronology in North Carolina, USA. We conducted controlled field‐tests at 20 locations to compare how detection of gobbles differed by ARU software, manual review of ARUs, and in‐field human observers. Autonomous detections had the lowest probability, with detection probabilities approaching 0 at 300 m from the ARU. Autonomous detections of gobbles were affected by leaf‐on conditions and topographical interference while vegetation type surrounding ARUs had minimal and inconsistent effects on detection. We deployed ARUs on properties with little or no turkey hunting across North Carolina from March–May during 2016 through 2019 to explore annual and regional variation in gobbling chronology. We used ARUs to monitor gobbling chronology and recorded 53,943 hours of audio files from which we confirmed 113,737 gobbles out of a total of 602,053 possible sound events identified. We identified multimodal gobbling chronology across 3 primary physiographic regions in North Carolina. We also found comparable timing of gobbling chronology across the 3 regions, with 57–61% of gobbling occurring during the weeks in which hunting seasons occur. We recommend that researchers validate ARU performance to calibrate monitoring of gobbling chronology. Additionally, our gobbling chronology data suggest that a statewide framework, rather than a regionally split framework, is appropriate for wild turkey hunting in North Carolina.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Reference38 articles.

1. Mode testing, critical bandwidth and excess mass

2. Bevill W. V. Jr.1973.Some factors influencing gobbling activity among wild turkeys.Proceedings of the Twenty‐Seventh Annual Conference Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners27:62‒73.

3. Bevill W. V. Jr.1975.Setting spring gobbler hunting seasons by timing peak gobbling.National Wild Turkey Symposium3:198‒2045.

4. Use of autonomous recording units increased detection of a secretive marsh bird

5. Gobbling activity of eastern wild turkeys relative to male movements and female nesting phenology in South Carolina

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3