Identification of Gaps in Quality of Care and Good Practice Interventions in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Insights From a Literature Review and Qualitative Study of Nine Centers in North America

Author:

Curtis Jeffrey R.1ORCID,Bykerk Vivian P.2,Crow Mary K.2ORCID,Danila Maria I.1ORCID,Haraoui Boulos3,Karpouzas George A.4ORCID,Newman Eric D.5,Norton Hillary6,Peterson Jeff7,Thorne Carter8,Wright Grace C.9,Bain Lorna10

Affiliation:

1. University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama

2. Hospital for Special Surgery New York New York

3. Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal Montreal Quebec Canada

4. Harbor–University of California, Los Angeles, Medical Center Torrance California

5. Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, ELAN Consulting Company Danville Pennsylvania

6. Santa Fe Rheumatology Santa Fe New Mexico

7. Western Washington Medical Group Everett Washington

8. Centre of Arthritis Excellence and The Arthritis Program Research Group Newmarket Ontario Canada

9. Grace C. Wright, MD, PC New York New York

10. Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, Ontario, Canada (current affiliation: Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)

Abstract

ObjectiveQuality of care (QoC) delivery in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) continues to suffer from various challenges (eg, delay in diagnosis and referral) that can lead to poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to identify good practice interventions that address these challenges in RA care in North America.MethodsThe study was conducted in three steps: (1) literature review of existing publications and guidelines (April 2005 to April 2021) on QoC in RA; (2) in‐person visits to >50 individual specialists and health care professionals across nine rheumatology centers in the United States and Canada to identify challenges in RA care and any corresponding good practice interventions; and (3) collation and organization of findings of the two previous methods by commonalities to identify key good practice interventions, followed by further review by RA experts to ensure key challenges and gaps in RA care were captured.ResultsSeveral challenges and eight good practice interventions were identified in RA care. The interventions were prioritized based on the perceived positive impact on the challenges in care and ease of implementation. High‐priority interventions included the use of technology to improve care, streamlining specialist treatment, and facilitating comorbidity assessment and care. Other interventions included enabling patient access to optimal medication regimens and improving patient self‐management strategies.ConclusionLearnings from the study can be implemented in other rheumatology centers throughout North America to improve RA care. Although the study was completed before the COVID‐19 pandemic, the findings remain relevant.

Funder

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Sanofi

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3