Treating the symptoms or the disease? Analysing the UK Online Safety Act's approach to digital regulation

Author:

Nash Victoria1ORCID,Felton Lisa1

Affiliation:

1. Oxford Internet Institute University of Oxford Oxford UK

Abstract

AbstractIn recent years, the pace of Internet regulation around the world has quickened, with states increasingly confident that they can and should hold major platform companies to account. New laws have been developed to address the risks of digital technologies and law‐makers have drawn on familiar regulatory principles and legacy frameworks in addressing them. But the nature of the technologies and the business models supporting them bring new challenges which make it less clear that old approaches will work. To succeed, legislative frameworks must evolve and adapt. Against this backdrop we assess the UK's Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA), which was expected to provide an innovative and broad‐reaching ‘systems‐based’ approach to reducing user risks and harms, particularly in relation to child safety. We argue that although the Act does incorporate measures to regulate platform design, it fails to fully embrace this and faces some challenges in ensuring proportionality and accountability. We conclude that the development of the OSA is hampered by a legacy focus on content controls which may limit its ability to effectively improve online safety, particularly as services evolve.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference40 articles.

1. 5Rights Foundation. (2021). Ambitions for the Online Safety Bill.https://5rightsfoundation.com/uploads/Ambitions_for_the_Online_Safety_Bill.pdf

2. 5Rights Foundation NSPCC CHIS. (2022). Children's Charities Amendments for the Online Safety Bill (OSA32).https://bills.parliament.uk/publications/46593/documents/1840

3. Age Verification Providers Association. (2023). Defining assurance verification and estimation.https://avpassociation.com/definitions/

4. Angel M. P. &Boyd D.(2024).Techno‐legal solutionism: Regulating children's online safety in the United States. In CSLAW'24: 3rd ACM Computer Science and Law Symposium March 12–13 2024 Boston USA.

5. The fiduciary model of privacy;Balkin J. M.;Harvard Law Review,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3