Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment‐10 (RSA‐10)

Author:

Lechien Jérôme R.1234ORCID,De Marrez Lisa G.4,Finck Camille15,Saussez Sven23

Affiliation:

1. Research Committee of the Young‐Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto‐rhino‐laryngological Societies (YO‐IFOS) Paris France

2. Division of Laryngology and broncho‐esophagology, Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology University of Mons (UMons) Mons Belgium

3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery CHU Saint‐Pierre Brussels Belgium

4. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital Paris Saclay University Paris France

5. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery CHU de Liège (Sart Tilman) Liège Belgium

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop and validate the Reflux Sign Assessment‐10 (RSA‐10) for documenting the physical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).MethodsPatients with LPRD at the hypopharyngeal‐esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance‐pH monitoring and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from two European hospitals. Three experienced otolaryngologists rated RSA‐10 in patients and controls for assessing internal validity. RSA‐10 was rated within a 7‐day period to assess test‐retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α in patients and controls. Convergent validity was evaluated through a correlation analysis between RSA‐10 and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Interrater reliability was evaluated by comparing the RSA‐10 evaluations of the three otolaryngologists through Fleiss kappa. Pre‐ to posttreatment change of RSA‐10 was evaluated to assess responsiveness to change. The RSA‐10 thresholds were examined by receiver operating characteristic analysis.ResultsFifty‐five patients completed the pre‐ to posttreatment evaluations from January 2020 to December 2023. A total of 115 asymptomatic individuals completed the study. RSA‐10 reported high internal consistency reliability (α = 0.822) and test‐retest reliability (rs = 0.725). The RSA‐10 scores of patients were significantly higher than those of controls (p = 0.001), suggesting high internal validity. RSA‐10 was significantly correlated with the RFS (rs = 0.771). The interrater reliability was adequate for sub‐ and total RSA‐10 scores (k = 0.708). RSA‐10 significantly improved from baseline to 3‐month posttreatment (p = 0.001). An RSA‐10 > 13 may be suggestive of LPRD. Both RSA‐10 > 13 and Reflux Symptom Score‐12 > 11 were associated with a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 97.3%.ConclusionThe RSA‐10 is a reliable and valid clinical instrument for documenting the most prevalent laryngeal and extra‐laryngeal findings associated with LPRD.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 134:3981–3988, 2024

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3