Affiliation:
1. UniSA Justice & Society University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia
2. UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance University of South Australia Adelaide South Australia Australia
3. School of Allied Health Human Services and Sport La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesOvarian cancer survivorship is complex and is associated with greater symptom burden, fear of reoccurrence, sexual dysfunction, lower quality of life and heightened existential distress in contrast to other cancers. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effectiveness for, and perspective of, psychosocial interventions encompassing psychological, social, and emotional support, tailored to, or involving ovarian cancer survivors at all stages of disease.MethodsAdhering to the PRISMA‐SR statement guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases, Google, and Google Scholar. Two reviewers independently undertook a two‐stage screening process. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was utilised to assess the methodological quality of included studies. Data were extracted using customised data extraction tools and narratively synthesised.ResultsThirteen studies were included in this review. Generally positive effects of psychosocial interventions were observed across a range of outcome domains (meaning enhancing, cognitive, social, emotional, and cancer‐specific). However, the characteristics of interventions and outcome measures varied across studies. Psychoeducational interventions were identified as the most common psychosocial approach, while Acceptance and Commitment Therapy showed promise in addressing the disease's high symptom burden. Women's perspectives of psychosocial interventions were described as “useful” and promoted positive self‐regard.ConclusionWhile the evidence base largely support positive effects of psychosocial interventions for ovarian cancer survivors, this finding is constrained by heterogeneity of interventions and modest gains. Future research may explore the standardisation of psychosocial interventions for this demographic, investigating its effects on less explored but prevalent concerns among ovarian cancer survivors such as fear of cancer recurrence and sexual dysfunction.
Reference47 articles.
1. World Ovarian Cancer Coalition.Ovarian Cancer Key Stats;2023. [https://worldovariancancercoalition.org/about‐ovarian‐cancer/key‐stats/
2. Ovarian Cancer Research Foundation.Facts about Ovarian Cancer;2023.
3. Cancer Australia.Gynaecological Cancers;2023. [https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/cancer‐types/gynaecological‐cancers/statistics
4. Psychosocial interventions for advanced cancer patients: A systematic review