Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery Oregon Heath & Science University (OHSU) Portland Oregon USA
2. OHSU School of Medicine Portland Oregon USA
3. Division of Hematology Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU) Portland OR USA
4. Department of Surgery Division of Surgical Oncology OHSU Portland Oregon USA
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) often impinges on the biliary tree and obstruction necessitates stent placement increasing the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs). We sought to explore the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the biliary microbiome and SSI risk in patients undergoing resection.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on 346 patients with PDAC who underwent resection at our institution from 2008 to 2021. Univariate and multivariate methods were utilized for analysis.ResultsBiliary stenting rates were similar between groups but resulted in increased bile culture positivity (97% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Culture positivity did not differ between upfront resection or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) (77% vs. 80%, p = 0.60). NAC‐alone versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not impact biliary positivity (80% vs. 79%, p = 0.91), nor did 5‐fluorouracil versus gemcitabine‐based regimens (73% vs. 85%, p = 0.19). While biliary stenting increased incisional SSI risk (odds ratios [OR]: 3.87, p = 0.001), NAC did not (OR: 0.83, p = 0.54). Upfront resection, NAC, and chemoradiotherapy were not associated with biliary organism‐specific changes or antibiotic resistance patterns.ConclusionsBiliary stenting is the greatest predictor for positive biliary cultures and SSIs in resected PDAC patients. Neither NAC nor radiotherapy impact bile culture positivity, speciation, rates, or antibiotic resistance patterns, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis should not differ.
Subject
Oncology,General Medicine,Surgery