Accuracy of models to prognosticate survival after surgery for pancreatic cancer in the era of neoadjuvant therapy

Author:

Marcinak Clayton T.1ORCID,Parker William F.2,Parikh Alexander A.3,Datta Jashodeep4,Maithel Shishir K.5ORCID,Kooby David A.5ORCID,Burkard Mark E.6,Kim Hong Jin7,LeCompte Michael T.7,Afshar Majid8,Churpek Matthew M.8,Zafar Syed Nabeel1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

2. Section of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Pritzker School of Medicine University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA

3. Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson – Mays Cancer Center San Antonio Texas USA

4. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami Miami Florida USA

5. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA

6. Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

7. Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

8. Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOutcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remain difficult to prognosticate. Multiple models attempt to predict survival following the resection of PDAC, but their utility in the neoadjuvant population is unknown. We aimed to assess their accuracy among patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).MethodsWe performed a multi‐institutional retrospective analysis of patients who received NAC and underwent resection of PDAC. Two prognostic systems were evaluated: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Nomogram (MSKCCPAN) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. Discrimination between predicted and actual disease‐specific survival was assessed using the Uno C‐statistic and Kaplan–Meier method. Calibration of the MSKCCPAN was assessed using the Brier score.ResultsA total of 448 patients were included. There were 232 (51.8%) females, and the mean age was 64.1 years (±9.5). Most had AJCC Stage I or II disease (77.7%). For the MSKCCPAN, the Uno C‐statistic at 12‐, 24‐, and 36‐month time points was 0.62, 0.63, and 0.62, respectively. The AJCC system demonstrated similarly mediocre discrimination. The Brier score for the MSKCCPAN was 0.15 at 12 months, 0.26 at 24 months, and 0.30 at 36 months, demonstrating modest calibration.ConclusionsCurrent survival prediction models and staging systems for patients with PDAC undergoing resection after NAC have limited accuracy.

Funder

National Institute of General Medical Sciences

National Institutes of Health

National Human Genome Research Institute

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Oncology,General Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3