Cost-effectiveness of systemic and regional chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Cost-effectiveness of systemic and regional chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases

Published:1998-09-01 Issue:5 Volume:83 Page:882-888
ISSN:0008-543X
Container-title:Cancer
language:en
Short-container-title:Cancer

Author:

Durand-Zaleski Isabelle,Earlam Sally,Fordy Carol,Davies Michael,Allen-Mersh Timothy G.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference28 articles.

1. Improving survival after large bowel cancer.

2. Expectancy or primary chemotherapy in patients with advanced asymptomatic colorectal cancer: a randomized trial.

3. Quality of life and survival with continuous hepatic-artery floxuridine infusion for colorectal liver metastases

4. Colorectal cancer: epidemiology, aetiology, pathology, clinical features and diagnosis. In: editors. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Volume 1. Oxford: W.B. Saunders 1993: 830-3.

5. Colorectal liver metastases.

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The NICE UK geographic search filters for MEDLINE and Embase (Ovid): Post‐development study to further evaluate precision and number‐needed‐to‐read when retrieving UK evidence;Research Synthesis Methods;2020-08-05

2. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ablative therapies in the management of liver metastases: systematic review and economic evaluation;Health Technology Assessment;2014-01

3. The re-birth of hepatic arterial infusion for colorectal liver metastases;J GASTROINTEST ONCOL;2013

4. Using Whole Disease Modeling to Inform Resource Allocation Decisions: Economic Evaluation of a Clinical Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Using a Single Model;Value in Health;2013-06

5. Systematic review of economic evidence for the detection, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom;International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care;2009-10