The Nature of Technical Debt in the Development of Descriptive Models for MBSE

Abstract

AbstractModel‐Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) is the growing practice of systems engineering (SE) in which descriptive models replace documents as the embodiment of SE knowledge. These descriptive models capture SE information in place of documents, are developed in a similar manner to software source code, and are encoded and used in machine‐to‐machine applications as data. This paper describes how the Technical Debt concept widely used in the software domain—rework deferred to the future for expediency—needs to be modified for the domain of descriptive models. Technical Debt is often associated with agile development practices of software or descriptive models, which emphasize the rapid creation and iterative evolution of a Minimum Viable Product (MVP). Consciously applying appropriate modeling principles and practices is essential to make informed decisions during the modeling process to prevent the accumulation of excessive model Technical Debt—particularly during this iterative evolutionary process—which can require substantial rework to correct. The paper establishes a foundation for characterizing the Technical Debt implications of key model architecture and implementation decisions that are made explicitly or implicitly by modelers when developing descriptive models. To illustrate the model Technical Debt concept, several examples of modeling principles pertaining to model purpose and implementation are described along with their implications on model Technical Debt.