Menu labeling and portion size control to improve the out‐of‐home food environment: A scoping review

Author:

Jeyashree Kathiresan1ORCID,Abdulkader Rizwan S.1,Haridoss Madhumitha1,Govindaraju Ranjithkumar1,Brand Amanda2,Visser Marianne2ORCID,Gordon Sarah2,Tiwari Hemant1,Sumitha T. S.1,Chandran Krupa1ORCID,Mabetha Denny3,Durão Solange3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Chennai India

2. Department of Cochrane Nutrition Centre for Evidence‐Based Health Care Stellenbosch University Cape Town South Africa

3. Department of Cochrane Nutrition, Health Systems Research Unit South African Medical Research Council Tygerberg South Africa

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundMenu labeling and portion size control interventions may be effective strategies to mitigate the health risks posed by the out‐of‐home food environment. We conducted this scoping review to map the body of evidence (BoE) addressing the effects of menu labeling and portion size control interventions in the out‐of‐home food environment and to summarize the research gaps in this evidence base.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Epistemonikos, and PROSPERO in phase 1 for systematic reviews (SRs) and PubMed and Embase in phase 2 for primary studies in areas with insufficient SR evidence. We used a comprehensive search strategy without any restrictions on publication date, language, study population characteristics or outcomes. We screened all titles independently and in duplicate. We mapped the number of systematic reviews providing evidence per intervention‐setting combination in a matrix. The gaps in the matrix informed the searches for primary studies in phase 2. For the included SR protocols and primary studies, we charted the population, intervention, comparator, outcome, period, and study design to facilitate their evaluation and inclusion in future evidence syntheses.ResultsWe included 69 completed SRs; 37 on menu labeling, 9 on portion size control, and 23 on both. The types of menu labeling interventions studied were quantitative nutrient information (74%), interpretational guidance (48%), or contextual guidance (13%). Most reviews were from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. Most SRs included studies in establishments like cafeterias (51%) or restaurants (39%) and measured change in the quantity of food offered/ordered/consumed (96%). Phase 2 search yielded 24 primary studies; 16 experimental, 6 quasi‐experimental, and 2 observational studies.ConclusionThe BoE on the effectiveness of menu labeling and portion size control is predominantly from the developed world, on nutrient information labeling and reporting impact on consumer food choice. There is a need for studies in the online environment and reporting distal health outcomes.

Funder

World Health Organization

Publisher

Wiley

Reference31 articles.

1. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990–2019

2. RhodesDG ClemensJC GoldmanJD LaCombRP MoshfeghAJ. 2013‐2014 What We Eat in America NHANES Table 1‐56. Worldwide Web Site: Food Surveys Research Group; 2016.

3. Association between eating out of home and body weight;Bezerra IN;Nutr Res,2012

4. Consumption Frequency of Foods Away from Home Linked with Higher Body Mass Index and Lower Fruit and Vegetable Intake among Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

5. The Relationship Between the Supply of Fast-food Chains and Cardiovascular Outcomes

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3