Abstract
Drawing from Scharpf's joint decision making approach and his concept of the joint decision trap, the following paper researches the development of municipal infrastructure investment in relation to the overall financial situation. The analyzed data are being provided by a representative panel survey among 4,000 German municipalities conducted in 2016 by the German Institute of Urban Affairs. The starting point of the analysis is the description of a dilemma: growing financial disparities between the municipalities and a loss‐making infrastructure of many cities and towns leads to an institutionalization of a growing number of grant programmes and forms of mixed financing. These programmes—so the analysis guiding thesis—do not provide adequate solutions for the heterogeneity of municipal needs. By neglecting their individual needs they cannot take into account the growing disparities of municipal financial situations. Rather, they produce an institutional setting, which fosters sub‐optimal policy‐outcomes and is resilient to changes.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Political Science and International Relations
Reference87 articles.
1. Fiskalföderalismus
2. Advocacy Coalitions, Policy‐Oriented Learning and Long‐Term Change in Genetic Engineering Policy: An Interpretist View;Bandelow Nils C;German Policiy Studies,2006
3. Advocacy Coalition Framework
4. Föderalismus als dynamisches System
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献