Affiliation:
1. Department of Anthropology University of Illinois, Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL 61801 USA
Abstract
“Greed” and “excess” carry negative connotations in many of the societies in which we live, even if they are not typical terms framing a great deal of anthropological work today. My approach here is to suggest that “greed” and “excess” may be most productive to thinkers and analysts if we use the terms to lead us to topics to which they seem to be potentially connected—that is, to get us to explore those questions from a reinvigorated or new angle—rather than trying to identify analytically comparable enough phenomena that we could then call cases of “greed” or “excess” and compare them to each other. Hence, here, discursive connections between “greed” and moral failing, the invocation of “greed” as an accusation, and the sense that “greed” refers (somewhat implicitly, implicitly, or more explicitly) to serious inequality, accumulation (material or symbolic), and differentiation or distinction by being a desire for both are explored. This article also worries about certain possible unintended consequences of turning “greed” and “excess” into more typical frames of anthropological discussion.
Subject
Anthropology,Economics and Econometrics
Reference18 articles.
1. Dominguez V. R.(2005). “Seeing and not seeing: Complicity in surprise.” SSRC Social Science Research Council Web Forum: “Understanding Katrina: Perspectives from the social sciences.” Retrieved fromhttp://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献