Chimeric Versus Multiple Simultaneous Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo describe our experience with chimeric flaps and to assess the surgical outcomes and postoperative complications associated with chimeric flaps compared to multiple flaps.Study Design/MethodsPatients undergoing chimeric and multiple simultaneous free tissue transfer between June 2016 and October 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome of interest was the complication rate. Major complications required takeback to the operating room, hospital readmission, or transfer to the intensive care unit. Minor complications were managed conservatively. Secondary outcomes included operative time, length of hospitalization, and flap survival.SettingAcademic tertiary care center.ResultsOur analysis included 113 patients (chimeric n = 38, multiple n = 75). We found no significant difference in operative times or minor complications. Chimeric flaps were associated with a shorter length of hospitalization. The major complication rate was higher for chimeric flaps (42.1% vs 22.7%, P = .03), but each cohort only had 1 instance of total flap loss.ConclusionThe complexity of large head and neck defects poses a reconstructive challenge for microvascular surgeons. Our findings suggest that chimeric and multiple flaps both produce acceptable complication rates when used appropriately. Differences in complication rates may reflect differences in utilization. The chimeric flap remains a valuable option for those with prior radiation or radical resection, but it remains unclear the degree to which they lessen the inherent risk of postoperative complications within this population. Each technique must be weighed in context of the patient's reconstructive profile and the institution's surgical capabilities to optimize long‐term outcomes.