Comparison of remimazolam and midazolam for sedation during colonoscopy in Japanese patients: A propensity score matching analysis

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of sedation with midazolam and remimazolam for colorectal endoscopy.MethodsThis single‐center, two‐arm, post‐hoc analysis of the REM‐IICTJP01 study investigated the efficacy and safety of remimazolam for gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation. We enrolled 40 and 208 patients who underwent colonoscopy under remimazolam and midazolam sedation, respectively, during the same period. The primary outcome was the time from the end of the colonoscopy until discharge. The secondary outcomes included the time from the end of the colonoscopy until awakening, dosage, and adverse events. Propensity score matching was employed to eliminate the effect of confounding factors.ResultsThirty‐seven patients in each group were matched. After propensity matching, the time to awakening after colonoscopy was 28.0 (13.0–37.0) min in the midazolam group and 0 (0–0) min in the remimazolam group; moreover, the time till discharge was 40.0 (35.0–46.5) min in the midazolam group and 0 (0–5.0) min in the remimazolam group, both of which were significantly shorter in the remimazolam group (p < 0.01). The number of additional doses was 0 (0–0) and 2 (1–3) in the midazolam and remimazolam groups, respectively. The total dose was 2.0 (2.0–3.5) and 6.0 (5.0–7.0) mg in the midazolam and remimazolam groups, respectively.ConclusionsRemimazolam yielded significantly faster times to awakening and discharge safely compared to midazolam.