Unintended effects of algorithmic transparency: The mere prospect of an explanation can foster the illusion of understanding how an algorithm works

Author:

Ostinelli Massimiliano1ORCID,Bonezzi Andrea2,Lisjak Monika3

Affiliation:

1. College of Business Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton Florida USA

2. Leonard N. Stern School of Business New York University New York New York USA

3. W. P. Carey School of Business Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA

Abstract

AbstractThis research shows that merely believing that one can access an explanation of how an algorithm works can foster an illusory sense of understanding the algorithm, even when people do not actually access and read the explanation. This effect occurs because the belief that one can access an explanation provides a feeling of empowerment that fosters an illusory sense of understanding. In turn, this illusory sense of understanding can yield unfounded reliance on algorithmic determinations. We further show that this effect is moderated by the target of an explanation and by the perceived utility of an explanation in enabling consumers to use an algorithm more effectively. From a theoretical standpoint, we offer a novel psychological account of illusory understanding based on empowerment. From a practical standpoint, we point to an unintended effect of algorithmic transparency: merely knowing that one can access an explanation for how an algorithm works may lull consumers into a false sense of understanding that yields unfounded reliance on algorithmic recommendations.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference88 articles.

1. Privacy and human behavior in the age of information;Acquisti A.;Science,2015

2. Missing the trees for the forest: A construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth;Alter A. L.;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2010

3. Self‐efficacy conception of anxiety;Bandura A.;Anxiety Research,1988

4. Can algorithms legitimize discrimination?;Bonezzi A.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,2021

5. The human black‐box: The illusion of understanding human better than algorithmic decision‐making;Bonezzi A.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2022

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3