Disciplinary Expertise and Faculty Credentialing in Leadership Studies: Advancing a Necessary Conversation

Author:

Purcell Jennifer W.1ORCID,Smith Deborah N.1

Affiliation:

1. Norman J. Radow College of Humanities and Social Sciences Kennesaw State University Kennesaw GA 30144 USA

Abstract

The disciplinary backgrounds of leadership studies educators have considerable influence on the future of the field; however, disciplinary expertise and credentialing have yet to be examined thoroughly in the literature. Decisions pertaining to the preparation and credentialing of leadership educators, particularly among faculty, are a necessary supplement to existing discourse on the standardization of academic programs and the aim and scope of scholarship privileged within the field. While disciplinary boundaries are permeable and fluid, the organizational boundaries defined within institutions based on disciplinary affiliation impose specific expectations and limitations that may artificially constrain interdisciplinary pursuits, including those within leadership studies. The current article presents a conceptualization of how disciplinary expertise and faculty credentialing may shape the future of leadership studies. It is recommended that leadership studies faculty cultivate program‐level consensus, demonstrate the integrity of leadership studies curricula, enhance interdisciplinary legitimacy through boundary spanning, determine the future trajectory of leadership studies, and set the course accordingly.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Education

Reference113 articles.

1. Our response to the question: Next steps in clarifying the language of leadership learning

2. Waiting for Godot: Eight major problems in the odd field of leadership studies

3. Andenoro A. C. Allen S. J. Haber‐Curran P. Jenkins D. M. Sowcik M. Dugan J. P. &Osteen L.(2013).National Leadership Education Research Agenda 2013–2018: Providing strategic direction for the field of leadership education.https://www.stu.edu/wp‐content/uploads/sites/13/2020/09/NLEResearchAgenda.3.pdf

4. The National Leadership Education Research Agenda 2020–2025: Advancing the State of Leadership Education Scholarship

5. Measuring professional identity: a review of the literature and a multilevel confirmatory factor analysis of professional identity constructs

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3