Midwives' approach to the prevention and repair of obstetric perineal trauma in Spain

Author:

Laderas Díaz Estíbaliz1,Rodríguez‐Almagro Julián2ORCID,Picón Rodríguez Rafael3,Martínez Galiano Juan Miguel45ORCID,Martínez Rodríguez Sandra2,Hernández‐Martínez Antonio2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology La Mancha Centro General Hospital Alcázar de San Juan, Ciudad Real Spain

2. Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Ciudad Real Faculty of Nursing University of Castilla‐La Mancha Ciudad Real Spain

3. Department of General and Digestive Surgery Santa Bárbara Hospital Puertollano, Ciudad Real Spain

4. Department of Nursing Jaen University Jaen Spain

5. Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP) Madrid Spain

Abstract

AbstractAimDifferent clinical practice guidelines include recommendations on how to prevent and repair obstetric perineal trauma, as well as the use of episiotomy. To evaluate the variability in midwives' professional practices for preventing and repairing perineal trauma, as well as the professional factors that may be associated with the restrictive use of episiotomy.DesignObservational cross‐sectional study.MethodsThree hundred five midwives completed an anonymous questionnaire developed by the authors and distributed across various midwifery scientific societies. The main outcomes measured were the frequencies of adopting specific practices related to perineal injury prevention and repair, episiotomy technique and restrictive episiotomy use (<10%). Odds ratios (OR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated.ResultsIntrapartum perineal massage was not normally used by 253 (83%) of midwives, and 186 (61%) applied compresses soaked in warm water to the perineum. Regarding episiotomy, there was a great deal of variability, noting that 129 (42.3%) adopted a restrictive use of this procedure, 125 (41%) performed it between 10% and 20%, while 51 midwives (16.7%) performed it in more than 20% of cases. In addition, 165 (54.1%) midwives followed an incision angle of 60º. Concerning tears, 155 (50.8%) usually sutured first‐degree tears and 273 (89.5%) always sutured second‐degree tears. Midwives attending home births (aOR = 6.5; 95% CI: 2.69–15.69), working at a teaching hospital (aOR = 3.69; 95% CI: 1.39–9.84), and the ones who recently completed their professional training (aOR = 3.58; 95% CI: 1.46–8.79) were significantly more likely to adopt a restrictive use of episiotomy.ConclusionsThere is a significant variability in Spanish midwives' practices for preventing and repairing perineal tears. Moreover, the restrictive use of episiotomy is associated with midwives attending home births, working in teaching hospitals and having recent professional training.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference50 articles.

1. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma

2. Perineal trauma: incidence and its risk factors

3. Acien‐Alvarez P. Serra‐Serra V. Gonzalez‐Gonzalez A. Martinez‐Astorquiza T. Florido‐Navio J. Misguel‐Sesmero J. R. Ucieda‐Somoza R. Gonzalez‐Gonzalez N. Suy‐Franch A. Melchor‐Marcos J. C. Fabre‐Gonzalez E. Puertas‐Prieto A. Cararach‐Ramoneda V. Gallo‐Vallejo M. &Bajo‐Arenas J.(2018).Documento de Consenso SEGO. Asistencia al parto. Retrieved fromhttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0ByuDDZFNh88AZGNjMGY5NDctMDYzNi00OGM5LWJkZjMtZmM3MDc2ZmM2ZWMx/view?resourcekey=0‐TIwBq8e1Yel_wTXAXXV5QQ

4. Risk Factors for Dyspareunia After First Childbirth

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3