Treatment strategy for severe trauma patients requiring aortic occlusion for impending cardiopulmonary arrest in the hybrid emergency room

Abstract

AbstractAimComputed tomography (CT) is useful in trauma care. Severely ill trauma patients may not tolerate whole‐body CT even without patient transfer. This study examined clinical flow of severe trauma patients requiring aortic occlusion (AO) such as resuscitative thoracotomy or REBOA in the hybrid emergency room (ER) and investigated patient clinical courses prioritizing CT first versus resuscitation including AO first.MethodsThis retrospective, single‐center observational study included consecutive trauma patients visiting our ER between May 2016 and February 2023. Patients were divided into the CT first group (whole‐body CT preceded AO) and AO first group (AO preceded whole‐body CT) and into two subgroups: AO after CT (AO/interventions for hemorrhage performed just after CT in the CT first group), and CT after AO (CT or damage control surgery performed after AO in the AO first group). We investigated 28‐day survival rates.ResultsSurvival probability by TRISS method was 49% (range: 3.3–94) in the CT first group (n = 6) and 20% (range: 0.7–45) in the AO first group (n = 7). Actual 28‐day survival rates were 50% and 57%, respectively. Survival rates of the AO after CT subgroup (CT first group) were 75% (3/4) and 0% (0/2), respectively, and those of the CT after AO subgroup (AO first group) were 25% (1/4) and 100% (3/3), respectively.ConclusionIn severe trauma patients with low predicted probability of survival treated in the hybrid ER, survival rates might be better if resuscitation including AO is performed before CT and if damage control surgery is performed first before CT.