Patient perspectives of weight stigma across the cancer continuum: A scoping review

Author:

Hawley Nanako1,Green Jennifer2,Ahlich Erica1,Hauff Caitlyn3,Hermer Janice4,Skiba Meghan B.5ORCID,James Dara L.67,Nash Sarah H.89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USA

2. School of Exercise and Nutritional Sciences San Diego State University San Diego California USA

3. Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Sport University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USA

4. Arizona State University Library Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA

5. College of Nursing University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA

6. College of Nursing University of South Alabama Mobile Alabama USA

7. Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation Arizona State University Tempe Arizona USA

8. Department of Epidemiology University of Iowa Iowa Iowa USA

9. Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Iowa Iowa Iowa USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundWeight stigma has been defined as the social devaluation and denigration of individuals because of their weight. The purpose of this scoping systematic review was to assess and understand patient experiences with weight stigma in the cancer care setting.MethodsWe conducted a systematic scoping review of studies examining shame, prejudice, bias, and stigma in relation to weight and cancer‐related care using five databases: PubMed, CINAHL Plus Full Text (ProQuest), Cochrane Library, PsycINFO (EBSCO), and Scopus. Articles were uploaded into Covidence for de‐duplication and screening. Included studies were peer reviewed, reported adult patient experiences in cancer‐related care, and were published in English between October 2012 and February 2023. Study characteristics and key findings were abstracted and qualitatively synthesized.ResultsPublications meeting inclusion criteria yielded five studies (n = 113 participants). Most focused on the experiences of women (n = 4) and cancers which predominantly impact women (i.e., breast, cervical, endometrial; n = 4). All stages of the cancer continuum were included with studies examining screening (n = 2), treatment (n = 1), and post‐treatment survivorship (n = 2). Weight discrimination was discussed in four studies and weight‐biased stereotypes were discussed in three studies. Experiences of weight bias internalization were reported in four studies. One study described an instance of implicit weight bias.ConclusionsLimited studies examine patient experiences of weight stigma in cancer care; however, current evidence suggests that patients do experience weight stigma in cancer‐related care. This review highlights critical gaps and a need for more research on the prevalence and impact of weight stigma in cancer screening and care.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3