Consumer engagement in living evidence “a beautiful opportunity”: International qualitative study with patients and methodologists

Author:

Synnot Anneliese12ORCID,Weeks Laura3,Hill Sophie J.2,Lytvyn Lyubov45,Radar Tamara3,Randall Rebecca6,Morley Richard7,Jaure Allison89,Elliott Julian H.110,Turner Tari1

Affiliation:

1. Australian Living Evidence Collaboration, Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia

2. Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia

3. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health Ottawa Ontario Canada

4. McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada

5. MAGIC Evidence Ecosystem Foundation Oslo Norway

6. Health Consumer Representative Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia

7. Cochrane London UK

8. Sydney School of Public Health The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

9. Centre for Kidney Research The Children's Hospital at Westmead Westmead New South Wales Australia

10. Future Evidence Foundation Melbourne Victoria Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveWe aimed to explore the opportunities, challenges and practical strategies for consumer engagement (i.e., patient and public involvement) in living evidence (systematic reviews, guidelines and health technology assessments that are continually updated with the latest evidence).Study Design and SettingIn this international qualitative study, methodologists (producers of systematic reviewers, guidelines and health technology assessments) with an interest in living evidence, and consumers (patients, informal carers, the public and their representatives) with experience contributing to evidence synthesis production participated in either a face‐to‐face workshop, online focus group or semistructured interview. We analysed data using descriptive synthesis.ResultsForty‐one methodologists and seven consumers from nine countries participated. A minority of participants in both groups had direct experience with living evidence synthesis. We identified seven themes: harnessing consumer enthusiasm in recruitment; ‘better’ consumer engagement based on deeper relationships; improved and ongoing orientation, support and remuneration; maintaining an ongoing commitment; potentially different guideline development stages and tasks; larger groups of consumers and multiple roles; and ongoing incorporation of consumer insights.ConclusionMethodologists and consumers believe living evidence approaches present an imperative and an opportunity to explore new models of consumer engagement, bringing together larger and more diverse communities of consumers in true partnerships with methodologists. Consumer engagement strategies for living evidence allow ongoing improvement to engagement methods and ongoing incorporation of consumer experiences, preferences and values as they develop and change over time.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3