Outcomes of revisional surgery options after inadequate sleeve gastrectomy: A comprehensive network meta‐analysis

Author:

Salman Mohamed AbdAlla1ORCID,Salman Ahmed2,Elewa Ahmed3,Elsherbiny Mohammed4,Tourkey Mohamed5,Chikukuza Stewart5,Gadallah Mohamed A.6,Ismail Ahmed Abdelaziz7,Hussein Ahmed Mahmoud1

Affiliation:

1. General Surgery Department Kasralainy School of Medicine Cairo University Cairo Egypt

2. Internal Medicine Department Kasralainy School of Medicine Cairo University Cairo Egypt

3. General Surgery Department National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute Cairo Egypt

4. General Surgery Department United Lincolnshire NHS Trust Lincoln UK

5. General Surgery Department Great Western Hospital Swindon UK

6. Department of General Surgery Faculty of Medicine Al‐Azhar University Assuit Branch Assuit Egypt

7. Anesthesia and Pain Management Department Kasralainy School of Medicine Cairo University Cairo Egypt

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundDespite the success of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in of weight loss and treatment of the medical problems associated with obesity, some concerns have arisen about the need for revisional surgeries after SG in some patients. This study aimed to present an updated and comprehensive comparison among the presently available revisional surgeries employed explicitly in cases of inadequate outcomes after SG, which is the most frequently performed bariatric surgery in contemporary practice.MethodsThis network meta‐analysis included studies that compared the outcomes of different revisional bariatric procedures after an inadequate outcome of SG.ResultsSearching across the electronic databases yielded 31 eligible articles. Re‐SG was associated with the highest rate of significant complications. Patients treated with single anastomosis duodenal‐ileal bypass (SADI) had a significantly higher percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) than those treated with one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGB). The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at the end of the follow‐up period was significantly higher in patients in the SADI group compared to those in the RYGB group and the OAGB, and re‐SG exhibited the least values compared to SADI, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS), and OAGB. Significantly lower rates of reflux worsening/de novo development were observed in the SADI group compared to the OAGB group and the re‐SG group, which showed significantly higher rates than SADI and RYGB.ConclusionOur comprehensive network meta‐analysis highlights SADI as a promising revisional option post‐SG, demonstrating superior weight loss outcomes, lower significant complication rates, and a favorable impact on reflux compared to other procedures. While acknowledging the limitations of our study, these findings support the potential efficacy of SADI in addressing the challenges of inadequate weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3