Memory strategies in autistic and older adults

Author:

Torenvliet C.1ORCID,Groenman A. P.12ORCID,Van der Burg E.1,Charlton R. C.3ORCID,Hamilton C. J.4ORCID,Geurts H. M.15ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dutch Autism & ADHD Research Center, Brain & Cognition, Department of Psychology University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

2. Research Institute Child Development and Education University of Amsterdam Amsterdam the Netherlands

3. GoldAge Lab, Department of Psychology Goldsmiths University London UK

4. Department of Psychology Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

5. Leo Kannerhuis, autism clinic (Youz/Parnassia Group) Amsterdam the Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractMemory strategies in autistic adults seem to mimic strategies at older age, as both younger autistic and older non‐autistic individuals use fewer semantic features in visual memory tasks. Therefore, the current study aims to investigate whether early differences in memory strategies lead to altered age‐related effects in autism, particularly whether initial difficulties in strategy use become advantageous at older age (i.e., “protective aging”). A total of 147 participants across four groups (autistic younger/older, non‐autistic younger/older) completed an online assessment. This assessment included a recognition version of the Visual Patterns Test (VPT) to evaluate semantic strategy use in visual memory, the Just Noticeable Difference (JND) size task for assessing visual processing, and the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire to evaluate subjective memory functioning and strategy use (MMQ). Unexpectedly, all groups benefited from semantic features on the VPT, although the older groups performed less accurately and slower than the younger groups. The JND Size task showed no group differences. Autistic adults rated their MMQ memory as worse than non‐autistic adults, despite reporting greater strategy use. These results indicate that cognitive strategies might be more similar between younger/older and autistic/non‐autistic people than previously expected, although notable discrepancies between objective and subjective measures were present. They also substantiate previously reported parallel (i.e., similar) age‐related effects between autistic and non‐autistic people.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3