Evaluating Diff‐Quik cytology smears for large‐panel mutation testing in lung cancer—Predicting DNA content and success with low‐malignant‐cellularity samples

Author:

Fielding David I.12ORCID,Dalley Andrew J.2,Singh Mahendra23,Nandakumar Lakshmy3,Lakis Vanessa4,Chittoory Haarika2,Fairbairn David3,Patch Ann‐Marie4,Kazakoff Stephen H.4,Ferguson Kaltin2,Bashirzadeh Farzad1,Bint Michael5,Pahoff Carl6,Son Jung Hwa1,Hodgson Alan3,Sharma Sowmya47,Waddell Nicola4,Lakhani Sunil R.23,Hartel Gunter4,Nones Katia48,Simpson Peter T.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Thoracic Medicine Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

2. UQ Centre for Clinical Research Faculty of Medicine University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. Pathology Queensland Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute Brisbane Queensland Australia

5. Department of Thoracic Medicine Sunshine Coast University Hospital Birtinya Queensland Australia

6. Department of Respiratory Medicine Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia

7. ACL Pathology Bellavista New South Wales Australia

8. School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland St Lucia Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCytology smears are commonly collected during endobronchial ultrasound–guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) procedures but are rarely used for molecular testing. Studies are needed to demonstrate their great potential, in particular for the prediction of malignant cell DNA content and for utility in molecular diagnostics using large gene panels.MethodsA prospective study was performed on samples from 66 patients with malignant lymph nodes who underwent EBUS TBNA. All patients had air‐dried, Diff‐Quik cytology smears and formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded cell blocks collected for cytopathology and molecular testing. One hundred eighty‐five smears were evaluated by microscopy to estimate malignant cell percentage and abundance and to calculate smear size and were subjected to DNA extraction. DNA from 56 smears from 27 patients was sequenced with the TruSight Oncology 500 assay (Illumina).ResultsEach microscopy parameter had a significant effect on the DNA yield. An algorithm was developed that predicted a >50‐ng DNA yield of a smear with an area under the curve of 0.86. Fifty DNA samples (89%) with varying malignant yields were successfully sequenced. Low‐malignant‐cell content (<25%) and smear area (<15%) were the main reasons for failure. All standard‐of‐care mutations were detected in replicate smears from individual patients, regardless of malignant cell content. Tier 1/2 mutations were discovered in two cases where standard‐of‐care specimens were inadequate for sequencing. Smears were scored for tumor mutation burden.ConclusionsMicroscopy of Diff‐Quik smears can triage samples for comprehensive panel sequencing, which highlights smears as an excellent alternative to traditional testing with cell blocks.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3