Riding the merry‐go‐round of racial disparities in ADRD research

Author:

Adkins‐Jackson Paris B.1ORCID,Kraal A. Zarina2,Hill‐Jarrett Tanisha G.3,George Kristen M.4,Deters Kacie D.5,Besser Lilah M.6,Avila‐Rieger Justina F.2,Turney Indira2,Manly Jennifer J.2

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Epidemiology & Sociomedical Sciences Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University New York New York USA

2. Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain Department of Neurology Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York New York USA

3. Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center University of California San Francisco San Francisco California USA

4. Department of Public Health Sciences University of California Davis School of Medicine Davis California USA

5. Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA

6. Comprehensive Center for Brain Health University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Boca Raton Florida USA

Abstract

AbstractINTRODUCTIONWith the rapid expansion of the aging population, the burden of Alzheimer's disease related dementias (ADRD) is anticipated to increase in racialized and minoritized groups who are at disproportionately higher risk. To date, research emphasis has been on further characterizing the existence of racial disparities in ADRD through comparisons to groups racialized as White that are assumed to be normative. Much of the literature on this comparison insinuates that racialized and minoritized groups experience poorer outcomes due to genetics, culture, and/or health behaviors.METHODSThis perspective shines a light on a category of ADRD research that employs ahistorical methodological approaches to describe racial disparities in ADRD that puts us on a merry‐go‐round of research with no benefits to society.METHODSThis commentary provides historical context for the use of race in ADRD research and justification for the study of structural racism. The commentary concludes with recommendations to guide future research.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

California Department of Public Health

Alzheimer's Association

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Geriatrics and Gerontology,Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Health Policy,Epidemiology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3