Episodic versus thematic media framing of violence against social leaders and human rights defenders in Colombia

Author:

Correa‐Chica Andrea1ORCID,Caicedo‐Moreno Angélica2ORCID,Rincón‐Unigarro Camilo3ORCID,Castro‐Abril Pablo2ORCID,López‐López Wilson4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Psychology, Basic Psychology and Methodology, Faculty of Psychology University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain

2. Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) San Sebastián Spain

3. Facultad de Psicología y Ciencias del Comportamiento Universidad de la Sabana Chía Colombia

4. Departamento de Psicología Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Bogotá Colombia

Abstract

Social leaders and human rights defenders (SLHRD) in Colombia have been under increasing attack for defending the rights of communities affected by violence. From 2016 to 2022, over 600 SLHRD were assassinated, resulting in a serious violation of both individual and community human rights. The media's portrayal of these attacks can shape public perceptions and influence efforts towards peacebuilding and promoting human rights. This study examines the media's framing of violence against SLHRD in Colombia between 2016 and 2020, a period marked by an escalation of violence after the signing of the 2016 peace accord between the Colombian government and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). We analysed 1506 textual publications from seven media outlets using a lexicometric approach and identified two frames of news articles: episodic and thematic. Our findings suggest that the episodic media framing may present a simplistic and non‐political perspective of the issue, which can impede peacebuilding efforts, while the thematic frame can raise awareness of violence against SLHRD and promote human rights defence. Our study highlights the media's significant role in shaping public opinion on violence against SLHRD, offering practical implications for advocacy and activism.

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

Eusko Jaurlaritza

Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea

Publisher

Wiley

Reference31 articles.

1. Framing of COVID-19 in Newspapers: A Perspective from the US-Mexico Border

2. Allum N.(1998).A social representations approach to the comparison of three textual corpora using ALCESTE. (Doctoral dissertation). London School of Economics and Political Science University of London.

3. Real, but Limited: A Meta-Analytic Assessment of Framing Effects in the Political Domain

4. La legitimación como proceso en la violencia política, medios de comunicación y construcción de culturas de paz [Legitimacy as a process in political violence, mass media and peace culture building];Barreto I.;Universitas Psychologica,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3