The effect of soil texture, layering and water head on the infiltration rate and infiltration model accuracy

Abstract

AbstractInfiltration is one of the most important physical characteristics of soil and depends on various factors. This study investigated the influence of soil texture, layering and water head on the soil water infiltration rate. It also selected the most accurate infiltration models to determine the water infiltration rate in homogeneous and heterogeneous soil profiles. Experiments were carried out in four soil containers with a length, width and height of 20 × 20 × 70 cm. Treatments consisted of two soil textures (sandy loam, SL; clay loam, CL), four soil profiles (homogeneous texture, SL and CL; and heterogeneous texture, lighter texture on the top, SL/CL, and heavier texture on the top CL/SL) and three water head sizes (4, 7 and 10 cm). Several models were used to determine the water infiltration rate under homogeneous (Kostiakov, modified Kostiakov, Philip, Horton, traditional Green–Ampt, modified Green–Ampt and HYDRUS‐1D) and heterogeneous soils (traditional Green–Ampt, modified Green–Ampt and HYDRUS‐1D). According to the results, the infiltration rate decreased over time and along the soil profile. Nevertheless, it jumped at the interface of two‐layered soils when the heavier soil was in the bottom layer (SC treatments) due to the high potential of the second layer, and then it decreased. In the reverse layering, the infiltration rate in the interface was lowest (CS treatments) because of the higher hydraulic conductivity of the second layer. Additionally, the infiltration rate increased with increasing water head, but the rate of this increase was higher by changing the water head from 7 to 10 cm. The results of infiltration models showed that the accuracy of these models was higher in clay loam texture than in sandy loam texture. The modified Green–Ampt was the most accurate model in homogeneous and layered soils, with average RMSE of 0.0204 and 0.019, respectively. The Horton model had the weakest simulation in homogeneous soils, with an average RMSE of 0.1299. Additionally, the accuracy of HYDRUS‐1D in layered soils was less than that in homogeneous soils (NS of 0.95 and 0.85, respectively), and its accuracy decreased with increasing water head in most treatments.