How do spin‐scaled double hybrids designed for excitation energies perform for noncovalent excited‐state interactions? An investigation on aromatic excimer models

Abstract

AbstractTime‐dependent double hybrids with spin‐component or spin‐opposite scaling to their second‐order perturbative correlation correction have demonstrated competitive robustness in the computation of electronic excitation energies. Some of the most robust are those recently published by our group (M. Casanova‐Páez, L. Goerigk, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 20, 5165). So far, the implementation of these functionals has not allowed correctly calculating their ground‐state total energies. Herein, we define their correct spin‐scaled ground‐state energy expressions which enables us to test our methods on the noncovalent excited‐state interaction energies of four aromatic excimers. A range of 22 double hybrids with and without spin scaling are compared to the reasonably accurate wavefunction reference from our previous work (A. C. Hancock, L. Goerigk, RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 35964). The impact of spin scaling is highly dependent on the underlying functional expression, however, the smallest overall errors belong to spin‐scaled functionals with range separation: SCS‐ and SOS‐PBEPP86, and SCS‐RSX‐QIDH. We additionally determine parameters for DFT‐D3(BJ)/D4 ground‐state dispersion corrections of these functionals, which reduce errors in most cases. We highlight the necessity of dispersion corrections for even the most robust TD‐DFT methods but also point out that ground‐state based corrections are insufficient to completely capture dispersion effects for excited‐state interaction energies.