Drain‐free mastectomy and flap fixation: The interim analysis of a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

Author:

Spiekerman van Weezelenburg Merel A.1ORCID,de Rooij Lisa1,Aldenhoven Loeki1ORCID,van Kuijk Sander M. J.2,van Haaren Elisabeth R. M.1ORCID,Janssen Alfred1,Vissers Yvonne L. J.1,Beets Geerard L.34,van Bastelaar James1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery Zuyderland Medical Centre Sittard Limburg the Netherlands

2. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment Maastricht University Medical Centre Maastricht the Netherlands

3. Department of Surgery Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam the Netherlands

4. GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology University of Maastricht Maastricht the Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionFlap fixation after mastectomy has proven to be one of the most promising solutions to reduce seroma formation. Drain placement remains standard practice in many clinics, even though this may be redundant after flap fixation.MethodsThis is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing mastectomy and wound closure using flap fixation with or without drain placement. The primary outcome measure was clinically significant seroma (CSS) incidence. The aim of this interim analysis was to assess the assumptions for the sample size calculation and to provide preliminary results.ResultsBetween July 2020 and January 2023, 112 patients were included. CSS incidence was 9.1% in the drain group and 21% in the no‐drain group. In total, 10 patients were lost to follow‐up. These numbers are similar to the ones used for the sample size calculation. In the drain group, three patients required interventions for wound complications compared to nine in the no‐drain group (odds ratio: 3.612 [95% confidence interval: 0.898−14.537]).ConclusionThe sample size calculation seems to be correct and no protocol amendments are necessary. Current preliminary results show no significant differences in CSS incidence. Complete results should be awaited to draw a well‐powered conclusion regarding drain policy after mastectomy.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3