AAPM Task Group Report 311: Guidance for performance evaluation of fluorescence‐guided surgery systems

Author:

Pogue Brian W.12,Zhu Timothy C.3,Ntziachristos Vasilis4,Wilson Brian C.5,Paulsen Keith D.2,Gioux Sylvain6,Nordstrom Robert7,Pfefer T. Joshua8,Tromberg Bruce J.9,Wabnitz Heidrun10,Yodh Arjun11,Chen Yu12,Litorja Maritoni13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Physics University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA

2. Thayer School of Engineering Dartmouth College Hanover New Hampshire USA

3. Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Institute for Biological and Medical Imaging Technical University of Munich Helmholtz Zentrum Munich Munich Germany

5. Department of Medical Biophysics University of Toronto, University Health Network Toronto Ontario Canada

6. Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Strasbourg Strasbourg France

7. Cancer Imaging Program National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA

8. Center for Devices and Radiological Health US Food and Drug Administration Silver Spring Maryland USA

9. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA

10. Physikalisch‐Technische Bundesanstalt Berlin Germany

11. Department of Physics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

12. Department of Biomedical Engineering University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst Massachusetts USA

13. Sensor Science Division National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg Maryland USA

Abstract

AbstractThe last decade has seen a large growth in fluorescence‐guided surgery (FGS) imaging and interventions. With the increasing number of clinical specialties implementing FGS, the range of systems with radically different physical designs, image processing approaches, and performance requirements is expanding. This variety of systems makes it nearly impossible to specify uniform performance goals, yet at the same time, utilization of different devices in new clinical procedures and trials indicates some need for common knowledge bases and a quality assessment paradigm to ensure that effective translation and use occurs. It is feasible to identify key fundamental image quality characteristics and corresponding objective test methods that should be determined such that there are consistent conventions across a variety of FGS devices. This report outlines test methods, tissue simulating phantoms and suggested guidelines, as well as personnel needs and professional knowledge bases that can be established. This report frames the issues with guidance and feedback from related societies and agencies having vested interest in the outcome, coming from an independent scientific group formed from academics and international federal agencies for the establishment of these professional guidelines.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3