Apportionment of institutional votes for the Nomenclature Section: A rebuttal to Smith & al.-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Apportionment of institutional votes for the Nomenclature Section: A rebuttal to Smith & al.

Published:2010-10 Issue:5 Volume:59 Page:1567-1570
ISSN:0040-0262
Container-title:TAXON
language:en
Short-container-title:Taxon

Author:

Applequist Wendy L.¹,Callmander Martin W.¹²,Davidse Gerrit¹,Sennikov Alexander³⁴,Thulin Mats⁵,Vorster Piet⁶,Yatskievych George¹

Affiliation:

1. Missouri Botanical Garden; P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299 U.S.A

2. Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la ville de Genève; ch. de l’Impératrice 1, Chambésy 1292 Switzerland

3. Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural History; University of Helsinki; Herbarium, Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; P.O. Box 7 00014 Finland

4. Herbarium, Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Prof. Popov str. 2, St. Petersburg 197376 Russia

5. Systematic Biology, EBC; Uppsala University; Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala 752 36 Sweden

6. Department of Botany & Zoology; University of Stellenbosch; Private Bag X1, 7602 Matieland South Africa

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Plant Science,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1002/tax.595020/fullpdf

Reference5 articles.

1. Institutional Votes at the Nomenclature Section of the XVIII International Botanical Congress, Melbourne, Australia, July 2011;McNeill;Taxon,2009

2. The handling of the proposal to conserve the name Acacia at the 17th International Botanical Congress-an attempt at minority rule;Moore;Bothalia,2007

3. Proposal to conserve the name Acacia (Leguminosae: Mimosoideae) with a conserved type;Orchard;Taxon,2003

4. Who amends the International code of botanical nomenclature?;Smith;Taxon,2010

5. Conserving Acacia Mill. with a conserved type. What happened in Vienna?;Smith;Taxon,2006

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. National Identity and International Science: The Case of Acacia;Historical Records of Australian Science;2012

2. Who amends the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature ? A response to Applequist & al. (2010);TAXON;2011-02

3. The controversy over the retypification ofAcaciaMill. with an Australian type: A pragmatic view;TAXON;2011-02