Affiliation:
1. Division of Materials Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology Nara Institute of Science and Technology (NAIST) Nara Japan
2. Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences Kyoto Prefectural University Kyoto Japan
3. Center for Digital Green‐innovation Nara Institute of Science and Technology (NAIST) Nara Japan
4. Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences Ritsumeikan University Kusatsu Japan
Abstract
AbstractSynthetic binding proteins have emerged as modulators of protein functions through protein–protein interactions (PPIs). Because PPIs are influenced by the structural dynamics of targeted proteins, investigating whether the synthetic‐binders‐based strategy is applicable for proteins with large conformational changes is important. This study demonstrates the applicability of monobodies (fibronectin type‐III domain‐based synthetic binding proteins) in regulating the functions of proteins that undergo tens‐of‐angstroms‐scale conformational changes, using an example of the A55C/C77S/V169C triple mutant (Adktm; a phosphoryl transfer‐catalyzing enzyme with a conformational change between OPEN/CLOSED forms). Phage display successfully developed monobodies that recognize the OPEN form (substrate‐unbound form), but not the CLOSED form of Adktm. Two OPEN form‐specific clones (OP‐2 and OP‐4) inhibited Adktm kinase activity. Epitope mapping with a yeast‐surface display/flow cytometry indicated that OP‐2 binds to the substrate‐entry side of Adktm, whereas OP‐4 binding occurs at another site. Small angle X‐ray scattering coupled with size‐exclusion chromatography (SEC‐SAXS) indicated that OP‐4 binds to the hinge side opposite to the substrate‐binding site of Adktm, retaining the whole OPEN‐form structure of Adktm. Titration of the OP‐4–Adktm complex with Ap5A, a transition‐state analog of Adktm, showed that the conformational shift to the CLOSED form was suppressed although Adktm retained the OPEN‐form (i.e., substrate‐binding ready form). These results show that OP‐4 captures and stabilizes the OPEN‐form state, thereby affecting the hinge motion. These experimental results indicate that monobody‐based modulators can regulate the functions of proteins that show tens‐of‐angstroms‐scale conformational changes, by trapping specific conformational states generated during large conformational change process that is essential for function exertion.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Murata Science Foundation
Subject
Molecular Biology,Biochemistry