Prevalence, trends, and characteristics of trials investigating local therapy in contemporary phase 3 clinical cancer research

Author:

Sherry Alexander D.1ORCID,Corrigan Kelsey L.1,Kouzy Ramez1,Jaoude Joseph Abi1ORCID,Yang Yumeng2,Patel Roshal R.13,Totten Douglas J.4,Newman Neil B.5,Das Prajnan6,Taniguchi Cullen67,Minsky Bruce6,Snyder Rebecca A.89ORCID,Fuller C. David1,Ludmir Ethan610ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Radiation Oncology Department of Radiation Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

2. Department of Biomedical Informatics The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Houston Texas USA

3. Department of Radiation Oncology Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center New York New York USA

4. Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA

5. Department of Radiation Oncology University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA

6. Division of Radiation Oncology Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

7. Division of Radiation Oncology Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

8. Division of Surgery Department of Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

9. Department of Health Services Research The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

10. Department of Biostatistics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAlthough most patients with cancer are treated with local therapy (LT), the proportion of late‐phase clinical trials investigating local therapeutic interventions is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion, characteristics, and trends of phase 3 cancer clinical trials assessing the therapeutic value of LT over time.MethodsThis was a cross‐sectional analysis of interventional randomized controlled trials in oncology published from 2002 through 2020 and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Trends and characteristics of LT trials were compared to all other trials.ResultsOf 1877 trials screened, 794 trials enrolling 584,347 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 27 trials (3%) included a primary randomization assessing LT compared with 767 trials (97%) investigating systemic therapy or supportive care. Annual increase in the number of LT trials (slope [m] = 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.39; p < .001) was outpaced by the increase of trials testing systemic therapy or supportive care (m = 7.57; 95% CI, 6.03–9.11; p < .001). LT trials were more often sponsored by cooperative groups (22 of 27 [81%] vs. 211 of 767 [28%]; p < .001) and less often sponsored by industry (5 of 27 [19%] vs. 609 of 767 [79%]; p < .001). LT trials were more likely to use overall survival as primary end point compared to other trials (13 of 27 [48%] vs. 199 of 767 [26%]; p = .01).ConclusionsIn contemporary late‐phase oncology research, LT trials are increasingly under‐represented, under‐funded, and evaluate more challenging end points compared to other modalities. These findings strongly argue for greater resource allocation and funding mechanisms for LT clinical trials.Plain language summary Most people who have cancer receive treatments directed at the site of their cancer, such as surgery or radiation. We do not know, however, how many trials test surgery or radiation compared to drug treatments (that go all over the body). We reviewed trials testing the most researched strategies (phase 3) completed between 2002 and 2020. Only 27 trials tested local treatments like surgery or radiation compared to 767 trials testing other treatments. Our study has important implications for funding research and understanding cancer research priorities.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3