Health care experiences of Black cancer survivors: A qualitative study exploring drivers of low and high Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems global ratings of care

Author:

Ochoa‐Dominguez Carol Y.12ORCID,Garrett Elleyse1,Navarro Stephanie1ORCID,Toledo Gabriela3,Rodriguez Claudia4,Iyawe‐Parsons Aisa5,Farias Albert J.167ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population and Public Health Sciences University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

2. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California San Diego San Diego California USA

3. Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health University College London London UK

4. Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

5. Loma Linda University Medical Center Loma Linda California USA

6. Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

7. Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California Los Angeles California USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThe purpose of this study was to understand the experiences of Black patients with cancer in health care by comparing drivers of high and low ratings.MethodsSemistructured in‐depth interviews were conducted with 18 Black patients with cancer recruited from cancer survivorship support groups and Facebook between May 2019 and March 2020. Interviews were coded across all transcripts by using a thematic analysis approach before comparing low‐ and high‐rating groups.ResultsThere were three major themes that influenced whether patients rated their care as low or high, which included the patient–provider relationship, health care staff interactions, and cancer care coordination. For example, the high‐rating group described good communication with the health care team as physicians listening to their needs, being responsive to their concerns, and providing recommendations on how to address side effects. In contrast, the low‐rating group described poor communication with their health care team as their needs being dismissed and being excluded from decision‐making processes. Additionally, there were two distinct themes that influenced patients’ low ratings: insurance and financial toxicity issues and experiences of health care discrimination.ConclusionsIn an effort to promote equitable cancer care experiences for Black patients, it is important that health systems work to prioritize patient interactions with health care providers and staff, comprehensive care management for patients with cancer, and reductions in the financial burden of caring for cancer.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference25 articles.

1. Will Improvements in Patient Experience With Care Impact Clinical and Quality of Care Outcomes?

2. Patient experience and patient safety in the specialty rankings: HCAHPS data will be incorporated into the methodology, and PSIs will be retired;Adams Z;US News and World Report, January 11,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3