Evidence‐Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Part 16: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods—Contrasting and Complementary Approaches

Author:

Ikeda Allison K.1,Suarez‐Goris Dany2,Reich Amanda J.34,Pattisapu Prasanth56,Raol Nikhila P.7,Randolph Gregory W.2,Shin Jennifer J.234

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Harvard Medical School Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Center for Surgery and Public Health Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA

4. Harvard Medical School Harvard University Boston Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University and Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA

6. Center for Surgical Outcomes Research, Abigail Wexner Research Institute Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USA

7. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

Abstract

AbstractQualitative methods have been increasingly applied in our literature, providing richness to data and incorporating the nuances of patient and family perspectives. These qualitative research techniques provide breadth and depth beyond what can be gleaned through quantitative methods alone. When both quantitative and qualitative approaches are coupled, their findings provide complementary information which can further substantiate study conclusions. We thus aim to provide insight into qualitative and quantitative methods in comparison and contrast to each other, as well as guidance on when each approach is most apt. In relation, we also describe mixed methods and the theory supporting their framework. In doing so, we provide the foundation for an ensuing, more detailed exposition of qualitative methods.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Reference36 articles.

1. Public and patient involvement in quantitative health research: A statistical perspective

2. Quantitative Vs qualitative research methods

3. MerriamSB TisdellEJ.Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. 4th ed.John Wiley & Sons;2016.

4. PrasadP.Crafting Qualitative Research: Beyond Positivist Traditions. 2nd ed.Routledge;2017.

5. CreswellJ.Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd ed.SAGE Publications;2013.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3