Affiliation:
1. Alliance Manchester Business School Manchester UK
2. Utrecht University School of Economics Utrecht The Netherlands
3. Open Universiteit Heerlen The Netherlands
4. KU Leuven Antwerp Belgium
Abstract
AbstractWhile the compressed workweek (CWW) has gained traction in recent years, its impact on firms' financial performance is not well understood. This study addresses this gap in the literature by examining the effect of the CWW on shareholder value. Drawing on social exchange theory and its norm of reciprocity, we introduce a conceptual model on the main effect of the CWW on shareholder value, and the moderating roles of the anticipated type and degree of employee reciprocation. To test the model's predictions, we exploit the announcement of Belgium's mandatory adoption of a CWW in February 2022 as the setting for a policy event study analysis. We find positive average stock price reactions of Belgian listed firms to the CWW's announcement, consistent with investors expecting the CWW to result in favorable employee reciprocation. Stock price reactions are more positive for firms with a lower ex ante employee productivity, suggesting employees are predicted to reciprocate with higher efforts. Stock price reactions are also more positive for firms with a higher reliance on knowledge workers, consistent with these employees deriving a greater utility from flexible working arrangements. Robustness tests, including a placebo analysis and an event study of international firms with Belgian subsidiaries, corroborate our results. Our study offers several theoretical contributions and has practical implications for HR managers and policymakers.
Funder
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Reference85 articles.
1. Labor contracts as partial gift exchange;Akerlof G. A.;The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1982
2. Attitudes toward work, leisure and the four day workweek;Allen R. E.;Human Resource Management,1979
3. Social identity and the problem of loyalty in knowledge‐intensive companies;Alvesson M.;Journal of Management Studies,2000
4. Share price reactions to work‐family initiatives: An institutional perspective;Arthur M. M.;Academy of Management Journal,2003
5. Taking stock of work‐family initiatives: How announcements of “family‐friendly” human resource decisions affect shareholder value;Arthur M. M.;Industrial and Labor Relations Review,2004