Varieties of approaches to constructing physical climate storylines: A review

Author:

Baldissera Pacchetti Marina123ORCID,Coulter Liese4ORCID,Dessai Suraje3ORCID,Shepherd Theodore G.5ORCID,Sillmann Jana67ORCID,Van Den Hurk Bart89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy University College London London UK

2. Department of Earth Sciences Barcelona Supercomputing Center Barcelona Spain

3. School of Earth and Environment University of Leeds Leeds UK

4. Faculty of Environment and Sustainability Royal Roads University Victoria British Columbia Canada

5. Department of Meteorology University of Reading Reading UK

6. Center of International Climate Research Oslo Norway

7. Research Unit for Sustainability and Climate Risks University of Hamburg Hamburg Germany

8. Deltares Delft The Netherlands

9. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractThe physical climate storyline (PCS) approach is increasingly recognized by the physical climate research community as a tool to produce and communicate decision‐relevant climate risk information. While PCS is generally understood as a single concept, different varieties of the approach are applied according to the aims and purposes of the PCS and the scientists that build them. To unpack this diversity of detail, this article gives an overview of key practices and assumptions of the PCS approach as developed by physical climate scientists, as well as their ties to similar approaches developed by the broader climate risk and adaptation research community. We first examine varieties of PCSs according to the length of the causal chain they explore, and the type of evidence used. We then describe how they incorporate counterfactual elements and the temporal perspective. Finally, we examine how value judgments are implicitly or explicitly included in the aims and construction of PCSs. We conclude the discussion by suggesting that the PCS approach can further mature in the way it incorporates the narrative element, in the way it incorporates value judgments, and in the way that the evidence chosen to build PCSs constrains what is considered plausible.This article is categorized under: Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Scenario Development and Application Climate, History, Society, Culture > Technological Aspects and Ideas Paleoclimates and Current Trends > Modern Climate Change

Funder

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Atmospheric Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Global and Planetary Change

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3