Conventional maxillary denture versus maxillary implant‐supported overdenture opposing mandibular implant‐supported overdenture: Patient's satisfaction

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThis study sought to determine the impact of age, gender, and use of maxillary implant‐supported overdenture (UISOD) versus conventional denture (CMD) opposing mandibular implant‐supported overdenture (LISOD) and the number of years the patient has used their prosthesis on the ratings of satisfaction. This study aimed to assess the long‐term influence of different factors on patients' satisfaction with LISODs needing a maxillary prosthesis, helping dentists choose a treatment pathway that leads to a higher satisfaction rate.Material and MethodsThis cross‐sectional study included 84 participants. They were treated with LISOD opposing either CMD or UISOD from 2015 to 2020. They were all eligible to participate in the study. An oral health impact profile (OHIP‐14) questionnaire was given to each patient and filled out by them. OHIP‐14 scores were gathered and went under statistical analysis with PASS‐11 software to determine the relationship between patients' satisfaction with the scores.ResultsAge and gender had no significant influence on how satisfied patients were. Patients with maxillary overdentures showed more satisfaction than the CMD group (p < .05). Moreover, patients' satisfaction decreased with increasing years of prostheses usage (p < .05).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that satisfaction is related to the type of maxillary prosthesis (conventional or implant‐supported) used opposing LISODs and the number of years the patient had used the prostheses.