Perceptions and implications for cervical screening and self‐collection: A qualitative exploration of never and under‐screened Queensland women

Author:

Haarsager Jennie1ORCID,Legerton Paula1,DeBats Claire1,Austin Glenn1,Vardon Paul1

Affiliation:

1. Queensland Health Cancer Screening Branch Herston Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOver 70% of cervical cancers are detected in women not currently screening. Queensland Health wanted to better understand the drivers of screening to inform our planning and capitalise on self‐collection as an option to reach under‐screened women. In 2020 Queensland Health commissioned qualitative research to explore barriers and enablers to cervical screening with never‐screened and under‐screened women in Queensland (with under‐screeners defined as having last screened more than 4 years ago and being more than 2 years overdue). Additionally, the research explored the acceptability of self‐collection amongst this cohort.MethodsA mixed methods qualitative approach of online focus groups and in‐depth interviews was employed. Online focus groups were conducted with under‐screeners. In‐depth telephone interviews were conducted with never‐screeners due to the anticipated personal nature of their reasons for not screening.ResultsA total of 51 Queensland women aged 30 to 50 years participated in the research.ConclusionsQueensland women cited several negative experiences and aspects of the current program, as well as barriers in their social and personal lives that limited screening intention and behaviour. Barriers and enablers to cervical screening identified in this research have been classified into four categories: structural, knowledge and attitudinal, social, and personal. The research identified more factors associated with nonparticipation than participation. However, the research did uncover a range of potential enablers to encourage screening, some of which related to the program design.So What?The concept of self‐collection was broadly well accepted by research participants, particularly by never‐screeners. Recommendations resulting from this research include communications, systems, and eligibility changes, particularly regarding the availability and benefits of self‐collection.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Community and Home Care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3