Challenging assumptions underlying physical activity promotion for health care professionals in Australia: A data‐prompted interview study

Author:

Kwasnicka Dominika12ORCID,Potthoff Sebastian3ORCID,Hagger Martin S.45ORCID,Vandelanotte Corneel6ORCID,Rebar Amanda7ORCID,Short Camille E.89ORCID,Crook Dawn10,Gardner Benjamin11ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NHMRC CRE in Digital Technology to Transform Chronic Disease Outcomes, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia

2. SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Faculty of Psychology Wroclaw Poland

3. Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK

4. Department of Psychology University of California Merced USA

5. Department of Sport Sciences Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä Jyväskylä Finland

6. Physical Activity Research Group Appleton Institute, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University Rockhampton Australia

7. School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University Rockhampton Australia

8. Melbourne Centre for Behaviour Change, Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences Parkville Victoria Australia

9. Melbourne School of Health Sciences University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia

10. Serco, Fiona Stanley Hospital Murdoch Western Australia Australia

11. Department of Psychology University of Surrey Guildford UK

Abstract

AbstractIssue AddressedInterventions targeting health care professionals' behaviours are assumed to support them in learning how to give behavioural advice to patients, but such assumptions are rarely examined. This study investigated whether key assumptions were held regarding the design and delivery of physical activity interventions among health care professionals in applied health care settings. This study was part of the ‘Physical Activity Tailored intervention in Hospital Staff’ randomised controlled trial of three variants of a web‐based intervention.MethodsWe used data‐prompted interviews to explore whether the interventions were delivered and operated as intended in health care professionals working in four hospitals in Western Australia (N = 25). Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis.ResultsFive themes were constructed: (1) health care professionals' perceived role in changing patients' health behaviours; (2) work‐related barriers to physical activity intervention adherence; (3) health care professionals' use of behaviour change techniques; (4) contamination between groups; and (5) perceptions of intervention tailoring.ConclusionsThe intervention was not experienced by participants, nor did they implement the intervention guidance, in the way we expected. For example, not all health care professionals felt responsible for providing behaviour change advice, time and shift constraints were key barriers to intervention participation, and contamination effects were difficult to avoid.So What?Our study challenges assumptions about how health care professionals respond to behaviour change advice and possible knock‐on benefits for patients. Applying our learnings may improve the implementation of health promotion interventions in health care settings.

Funder

Australian Research Council

Central Queensland University

Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University

National Health and Medical Research Council

Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia

Tekes

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Community and Home Care

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3