Access to symptom screening and severe symptom risk among cancer patients with major mental illness

Author:

Davis Laura E.1ORCID,Sutradhar Rinku234,Bourque Michaela A.5,Eskander Antoine236,Noel Christopher W.236,Isenberg‐Grzeda Elie78,Vigod Simone N.79,Coburn Natalie2310,Deleemans Julie11,Bolton James M.12,Chan Wing C.2,Hallet Julie2310,Mahar Alyson L.235

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology Biostatistics and Occupational Health McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada

2. ICES Toronto Ontario Canada

3. Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

4. Division of Biostatistics Dalla Lana School of Public Health University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

5. School of Nursing Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada

6. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery Faculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

7. Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

8. Psychosocial Oncology Odette Cancer Centre–Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre Toronto Ontario Canada

9. Department of Psychiatry Women's College Hospital and Research Institute Toronto Ontario Canada

10. Department of Surgery University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

11. Department of Oncology Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

12. Department of Psychiatry University of Manitoba Winnipeg Manitoba Canada

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionCancer symptom screening has the potential to improve cancer outcomes, including reducing symptom burden among patients with major mental illness (MMI). We determined rates of symptom screening with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS‐r) and risk of severe symptoms in cancer patients with MMI.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used linked administrative health databases of adults diagnosed with cancer between 2007 and 2020. An MMI was measured in the 5 years prior to cancer diagnosis and categorized as inpatient, outpatient, or no MMI. Outcomes were defined as time to first ESAS‐r screening and time to first moderate‐to‐severe symptom score. Cause‐specific and Fine and Gray competing events models were used for both outcomes, controlling for age, sex, rural residence, year of diagnosis and cancer site.ResultsOf 389,870 cancer patients, 4049 (1.0%) had an inpatient MMI and 9775 (2.5%) had an outpatient MMI. Individuals with inpatient MMI were least likely to complete an ESAS‐r (67.5%) compared to those with outpatient MMI (72.3%) and without MMI (74.8%). Compared to those without MMI, individuals with an inpatient or outpatient MMI had a lower incidence of symptom screening records after accounting for the competing risk of death (subdistribution Hazard Ratio 0.77 (95% CI 0.74–0.80) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.86–0.90) respectively). Individuals with inpatient and outpatient MMI status consistently had a significantly higher risk of reporting high symptom scores across all symptoms.ConclusionsUnderstanding the disparity in ESAS‐r screening and management for cancer patients with MMI is a vital step toward providing equitable cancer care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Oncology,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3