Tools for deprescribing in severe dementia: A scoping review

Author:

Wang Christina1,Roberts Eliot2,Smith Greg2,Carland Jane E.234,Cordato Nicholas J.567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of New South Wales Faculty of Medicine Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Department of Pharmacology School of Medical Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. School of Clinical Medicine University of New South Wales Medicine & Health St Vincent's Healthcare Clinical Campus Faculty of Medicine and Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. University of New South Wales School of Clinical Medicine St George and Sutherland Clinical Campuses Sydney New South Wales Australia

6. The Department of Aged Care St George Hospital Kogarah New South Wales Australia

7. Calvary Health Care Sydney Kogarah New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesIdentification of inappropriate medications in people living with severe dementia is a complex task which has the potential to reduce avoidable adverse events and increase quality of life. This scoping review (i) identifies published tools intended to aid deprescribing in people living with severe dementia and (ii) describes evaluations of their usefulness in clinical practice.MethodsA scoping review was undertaken, with Medline, Medline in Process, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases, from inception to April 2023, identifying tools for deprescribing in severe dementia. A tool was considered as any resource for deprescribing, including clinical study, scientific publication, health guideline, website, algorithm, model or framework. Two reviewers assessed the eligibility of articles through abstract and full text review. Data extracted from included studies were summarized through narrative synthesis.ResultsTwelve studies were identified from 18,633 articles screened. Tools were categorized into three groups: deprescribing interventions (n = 2), consensus‐based deprescribing criteria (n = 5), and medication‐specific recommendations (n = 5). Six studies developed tools using expert opinion and ten tools were tested in people living with severe dementia. Only one of the four studies that evaluated patient outcomes (cognitive change and adverse events) identified clear clinical benefit from medication withdrawal.ConclusionsClinical application of current deprescribing tools is limited due to the lack of evidence‐based research on the clinical effects of individual medication deprescribing in people with severe dementia. Further research on patient outcomes, including cognitive change and adverse events, will help clarify the role of these tools in clinical care.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Geriatrics and Gerontology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3