Geographic differences in the magnitude of black‐white disparities in having obesity

Author:

Cohen Steven A.1ORCID,Brown Monique J.2,Xu Furong3,Nash Caitlin C.1,Greaney Mary L.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Studies University of Rhode Island Kingston Rhode Island USA

2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Arnold School of Public Health University of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA

3. School of Education Alan Shawn Feinstein College of Education and Professional Studies University of Rhode Island Chafee Social Science Center Kingston Rhode Island USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundObesity disparities in the United States are well documented, but the limited body of research suggests that geographic factors may alter the magnitude of these disparities. A growing body of evidence has identified a “rural mortality penalty” where morbidity and mortality rates are higher in rural than urban areas, even after controlling for other factors. Black‐White differences in health and mortality are more pronounced in rural areas than in urban areas.ObjectiveTherefore, the purpose of this study was to explore how rural‐urban status and region moderate Black‐White health disparities in obesity.MethodsData were abstracted from the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, with the sample being restricted to Black and White respondents (n = 403,231). Respondents’ county of residence was linked to US Census information to obtain the county‐level Index of Relative Rurality (IRR) and Census division. Crude and adjusted logistic regression models were utilized to assess the magnitude of Black‐White disparities in having obesity (yes/no) by IRR quartile and by Census division.ResultsOverall, Black‐White differences in obesity were wider in rural than in urban counties, with a significant linear trend (p < 0.001). Furthermore, when stratified by US Census division, results revealed that disparities were significantly wider in rural than urban areas for respondents living in the Middle Atlantic and South Atlantic divisions. In contrast, the association was reversed for the remaining divisions (New England, East North Central, West North Central, Mountain, and Pacific), where the magnitude of the Black‐White difference was the largest in urban areas.ConclusionFindings highlight the need to understand and account for critical place‐based factors that exacerbate racial obesity disparities to develop and maximize the effectiveness of policies and programs designed to reduce racial inequalities and improve population health.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3